Our cookies

We use cookies, which are small text files, to improve your experience on our website.
You can allow or reject non essential cookies or manage them individually.

Reject allAllow all

More options  •  Cookie policy

Our cookies

Allow all

We use cookies, which are small text files, to improve your experience on our website. You can allow all or manage them individually.

You can find out more on our cookie page at any time.

EssentialThese cookies are needed for essential functions such as logging in and making payments. Standard cookies can’t be switched off and they don’t store any of your information.
AnalyticsThese cookies help us collect information such as how many people are using our site or which pages are popular to help us improve customer experience. Switching off these cookies will reduce our ability to gather information to improve the experience.
FunctionalThese cookies are related to features that make your experience better. They enable basic functions such as social media sharing. Switching off these cookies will mean that areas of our website can’t work properly.

Save preferences

You are here: HomePublicationsElectrical Waterbath Stunning of PoultryBleedingAutomated mechanical neck cutters

Automated mechanical neck cutters

Automated mechanical neck cutters (ANCs) can be set-up to deliver a ventral neck cut, but it is essential that every bird is presented to the blade(s) in the correct orientation, otherwise the carotid arteries may be missed. A guide rail system should accurately position a bird’s throat against the rotating blade(s) to cut very close to the head-neck junction, and to a sufficient depth to penetrate the muscle and sever both common carotid arteries.

ANCs can have two blades, which can be set up so a bird’s neck passes between them; this may produce a bilateral neck cut which is acceptable if both common carotid arteries and both external jugular veins are severed.

ANCs must not be set up to deliver a dorsal neck cut because a) this may miss both common carotid arteries and result in a slow bleed-out, and b) it may damage the spinal cord and prevent further assessment of the effectiveness of stunning. Therefore, ideally, the spinal cord should not be severed. However, the priority is to sever both carotid arteries and if this outcome can only be reliably achieved in conjunction with some damage to the spinal cord, then this is acceptable and the more appropriate choice for animal welfare.

The height of an ANC must be adjustable in order to suit each batch and type of bird processed, so all birds are cut in the correct anatomical position.

 

 

 

Next: Stun-to-cut time

Back to top